Status
Not open for further replies.
This was a fun episode. It's not the best star wars tv, but it's totally watchable.

I agree that the saber hilts all seem chunky and kinda meh.
 
Interesting theory I half read that this "sith" is the first "Ren"

I know nothing of the "Knights of Ren"... or if it's already established canon what "Ren" is all about? is it a "Darth" thin?

Like this is "Ren" and the knights over the next 100 years are the knights of Ren... and Kylo is a Ren...

Again, I watch the movies... some of the series... none of the comics or toons. But when someone said this may be the Ren those dudes follow... like their own little cult like the witches?

I dig it.

I love Kylo Ren, and this helmet is on par. Someone will hopefully do a metal version... or at least a metal jaw on a good base print.

Rarely buy black series 6 inch figures... but I'll grab him.
 
This was a fun episode. It's not the best star wars tv, but it's totally watchable.

I agree that the saber hilts all seem chunky and kinda meh.
I'm guessing that since the so-called "real" lightsabers they're selling now have to be chunky to fit the expendable/retractable blade and mechanisms inside, they're just making the new on-screen sabers big so that they can sell the "real" replicas that will look the same.
 
There's rumors that RT is going to lock it so the score doesn't fall any farther, which they have done. If all the accusations of review bombing were true, and if it was truly a good show, that score would have started to rise. All the people who loved it would start making it go up. I don't think there's any hope for this franchise if they constantly refuse to learn from their mistakes and don't put the story first.
Not necessarily. Here's some info on reviews I found:

Here's the ratio: It takes roughly 40 positive customer experiences to undo the damage of a single negative review. The ratio is derived from a combination of human behavior, math, and logic. Here's how I discovered it:A customer who has a negative experience is highly likely to share that experience by leaving a bad review.A customer who has a positive experience, on the other hand, is unlikely to leave a good review. In my experience, only one in 10 happy customers leaves a good review.

Here's the ratio: It takes roughly 40 positive customer experiences to undo the damage of a single negative review. The ratio is derived from a combination of human behavior, math, and logic. Here's how I discovered it:
  1. A customer who has a negative experience is highly likely to share that experience by leaving a bad review.
  2. A customer who has a positive experience, on the other hand, is unlikely to leave a good review. In my experience, only one in 10 happy customers leaves a good review.
  3. Your company or product rating (typically out of five stars) reflects an overall average of good and bad reviews. So if your goal is to maintain an overall rating of four stars, you'll need four five-star reviews to make up for every one-star review.
  4. Assuming that only one of every 10 happy customers leaves a positive five-star review, and knowing that it takes four five-star reviews to make up for each one-star review, you can figure it takes 40 positive customer experiences to make up for a single bad review.

So it can be a lot harder to make up for bad reviews, especially with a percentage syestem that just averages out the audience reviews.
For example, let's say 1000 people give a film 5 out of 5, another 1000 give it 3 out of 5, but 2000 give it 0.5 out of 5. The average of those 4000 reviews is 2.25 out of 5, or 45%. Even though half the people gave it a positive review, it's considered "rotten" because of the 2000 bad reviews.
I know Acolyte's audience score is lower than that, but my point is that it doesn't take a majority of bad reviews to drop the audience score into the "rotten" range, so it creates a false sense that most people disliked it.
 
You mean to tell me THIS dude is a Sith lord??

Ren-stimpy-25-anniversar-hp1y-1.png
 
I saw some clips on YouTube. The fight kinda looked cool. But man I still hate the way modern lightsaber look. They hardly seem to flash when they contact. (And then there's sparks? Why? Just why? Again it's cool that Kylo's saber did it. But not every saber.)
 
I saw some clips on YouTube. The fight kinda looked cool. But man I still hate the way modern lightsaber look. They hardly seem to flash when they contact. (And then there's sparks? Why? Just why? Again it's cool that Kylo's saber did it. But not every saber.)
His had a cracked kyber crystal, so it made sense.

I haven’t watched since episode three, but it looked like they were using Hasbro sabers in the first few eps.
 
I love Lenny Kravitz and apparently his new album was released this past March. This song stood out.

 
I didn't watch episode 4, but I'd heard statements that the fight choreography in episode 5 rivaled the prequels, so I sat down to watch. No engagement lasted more than 20 seconds, and there were more wipes than a newborn's diaper bag. As soon as they'd go to re-engage, wipe. It was annoying, and the only person who showed signs of prequel style was the girl, but I don't think we'll see much more of her. There were multiple times where Qimir was open to a saber hit and they chose to punch or kick. They are having the characters make decisions to move the plot along instead of having the plot influence the characters' decisions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top