Ok so I have a question for you "prop replica" accuracy nut, OCD types.
The version of R2 I'm trying to duplicate is the Tantive IV scene, the first time anyone ever laid eyes on our little blue friend.
The R2 builder in me says I'm close enough and should stop.
The RPF prop builder in me says, "Hey! what about those tiny rivets going all along the white areas surrounding the utility arms!?"
When I look at the comparison, the first thing that jumps out at me is the missing rivets, or nails, or whatever they are.
So I want your feedback.
Should I ..
A) leave it alone? as in "That was clearly never meant to be seen and the 'Real' R2 wouldn't have those rivets there."
or
B) it's the little details that count. Even the little rivets tell a story about how he was built both in-universe, and by the prop department. They're there on the real prop, they should be there on my replica.
I have a hard time with this one because while one type of cosmetic detail I agree 100% should be duplicated accurately (ie Vader C scar or Boba Fett's intricately paint chipped helmet) another type such as the aluminum braces mounted to R2's legs to hold them together for a single shot should not be. I tend to lean more toward duplicating every flaw, scratch, dent, ding, and rivet for my own gratification, but I don't want it to detract from the look of it or from what people expect to see when they look at him. I'm sure I'm already going to get, "Why is he dirty?" and I definitely don't want any "why did you nail his panels on?" comments, but at the same time a knowing glance, a thumbs up, or a "nice" from a fellow nerd who noticed them is also great.
When I look at mine compared to the real one, it seems to be missing a small bit of "greebliness", if that's a word, that the screen-used prop has and I think it's because of those rivets.
So what do you say? Yes or No. Your opinion matters.
Here's a quick photoshop to see what it would look like. it's subtle but it's there.