What a weird thing to be 'happy' about, but I am glad that the people doing this
aren't taking the time to make the pieces a lot more correct. If the physical evidence wasn't so painfully obvious, we would then be questioning people's reputations over smaller prop discrepancies while a LOT of people involved would be shrugging their shoulders and saying 'well I guess we can never be 100% on anything' (while potentially counting hundred dollar bills). This whole fiasco (like the phaser) just has a lot of people involved looking either incompetent, negligent, or willfully ignorant, but it could be a LOT WORSE.
I also wonder to what degree it's a bare-minimum avoidance of
legal liability on the part of the auction houses; You get a recognized name or company (Roger Christian, Bapty, etc) that
does have legitimate ties to the production of a piece, just take their word for it for provenance and legitimacy, and then say 'hey that's good enough, "
BECAUSE HE SAID SO". What happens then down the road, when as
joberg suggested, people like Roger are found to have been paid say 5-6 figures to vouch for it, after the physical prop evidence proves it's complete Bu77$h1t? Despite their percentages and profit, it also sure seems like more due diligence gets done here (for free) than at the action house taking 30%.