I wouldn’t do any of that… in fact I’m only getting one. My wife and daughter have no interest.I say…try if you will. I just proposed a possibility.
I’m just gettin 2….one to hoard with my other dup’s….. and one to play and display![]()
Let me clarify, the $6.09 is listed as an exchange rate FEE. It’s charged on top of shipping.Currently $1.30 to 1 British Pound. Not to bad. Ten year average graph shows the dollar is doing Ok. <shrug>
I'm so old my rule of thumb was $1.50 per Pound.![]()
Hey, on another subject entirely, have you guys read through the instructions yet? When you first get it, the magnetometers need calibrating. You have to rotate the tricorder through 360° in all three axes, then the orientation features will work. It's like you get to play with it before you get to play with it!
Here's the link to the instruction book in case you haven't seen it yet.
View attachment 1918470
I’m ok with flipping a switch, pressing a button…you know, the uncomplicated. But a retinue of navigating through a maze and layers of steps just to get it to say “do you want cheese with that whine” is utterly ridiculous.
I recently received this message from Richard Blakesley at The Wand Company. Funky, there’s some information in here for you too. I’m not sure this applies now that TWC has given us more info about tariffs.
Richard Blakesley (The Wand Company)
Mar 29, 2025, 21:01 GMT
Hi Jim,
I'll jump in here to answer that question, as I'm the person who wrote the website code that generates the certificates and their numbers (using artwork created by Chris, of course).
The numbers are, in general, sequential but, as you noticed, it doesn't always work out that way. Also, the number isn't incremented by one each time, so your certificate number does not mean that there are 77,633 people who registered their interest before you.
The page actually allocates a certificate number (incremented by one) for each person as soon as they visit the page, but the number only actually makes it onto a certificate (and into our database) if and when they complete the sign-up process. Only around 1 in 10 people who visit the page continue to sign up for the "interested" list, so most of the possible certificate numbers are actually discarded. We had a few reasons for doing this:
When we first launched the sign-up page, we didn't want it to look like tumbleweed if only 30 people signed up.
We thought it might be better if it was somewhat difficult to "fake" a certificate number, as only a subset of the possible numbers are actual valid numbers.
I can't remember why, but it was the easiest way to implement the certificate numbering at the time.
In hindsight, though, it's debatable whether or not it was actually a good idea – we've been very pleasantly surprised by, and grateful for, the enthusiastic response of Star Trek fans to this project, even though we've had so many hurdles and delays along the way. (And personally speaking as co-owner of the company, I'm also incredibly grateful for the persistence and talent of my colleagues James Thomas and Andrew Stockdale, who kept toiling away on the project for many years when plenty of other people would have given up.)
So, the high numbers shown on the certificates have probably caused unnecessary concern for some people – I'm sorry if this includes you.
I hope that helps, and that you enjoy the Tricorder when you finally get your hands on one. Thanks so much for all your patience, and for supporting us over the years.
Best wishes,
Richard
P.S. To answer your earlier question about the HTS code, it's not 100% finalised yet but I believe we're planning to bring the Tricorders into the UK under tariff code 8519 8900 00. This exact code doesn't exist in the United States HTS system, but is equivalent to 8519.89.20.00.
I recently received this message from Richard Blakesley at The Wand Company. Funky, there’s some information in here for you too. I’m not sure this applies now that TWC has given us more info about tariffs.
Richard Blakesley (The Wand Company)
Mar 29, 2025, 21:01 GMT
Hi Jim,
I'll jump in here to answer that question, as I'm the person who wrote the website code that generates the certificates and their numbers (using artwork created by Chris, of course).
The numbers are, in general, sequential but, as you noticed, it doesn't always work out that way. Also, the number isn't incremented by one each time, so your certificate number does not mean that there are 77,633 people who registered their interest before you.
The page actually allocates a certificate number (incremented by one) for each person as soon as they visit the page, but the number only actually makes it onto a certificate (and into our database) if and when they complete the sign-up process. Only around 1 in 10 people who visit the page continue to sign up for the "interested" list, so most of the possible certificate numbers are actually discarded. We had a few reasons for doing this:
When we first launched the sign-up page, we didn't want it to look like tumbleweed if only 30 people signed up.
We thought it might be better if it was somewhat difficult to "fake" a certificate number, as only a subset of the possible numbers are actual valid numbers.
I can't remember why, but it was the easiest way to implement the certificate numbering at the time.
In hindsight, though, it's debatable whether or not it was actually a good idea – we've been very pleasantly surprised by, and grateful for, the enthusiastic response of Star Trek fans to this project, even though we've had so many hurdles and delays along the way. (And personally speaking as co-owner of the company, I'm also incredibly grateful for the persistence and talent of my colleagues James Thomas and Andrew Stockdale, who kept toiling away on the project for many years when plenty of other people would have given up.)
So, the high numbers shown on the certificates have probably caused unnecessary concern for some people – I'm sorry if this includes you.
I hope that helps, and that you enjoy the Tricorder when you finally get your hands on one. Thanks so much for all your patience, and for supporting us over the years.
Best wishes,
Richard
P.S. To answer your earlier question about the HTS code, it's not 100% finalised yet but I believe we're planning to bring the Tricorders into the UK under tariff code 8519 8900 00. This exact code doesn't exist in the United States HTS system, but is equivalent to 8519.89.20.00.
The next question is how many units are being air freighted in each group?
As of March 30, 2025, the biggest commercial cargo aircraft currently in use is the Boeing 747-8F (Freighter). With the Antonov An-225 Mriya no longer operational—having been destroyed in February 2022 during the Russia-Ukraine conflict—the 747-8F takes the lead among active commercial cargo planes.
The Boeing 747-8F has a maximum takeoff weight of 447.7 metric tons (987,000 pounds) and can carry a payload of up to 137 metric tons (302,000 pounds). Its cargo hold offers a volume of 853 cubic meters (30,100 cubic feet), and it features a nose-loading design, making it ideal for oversized cargo. Powered by four General Electric GEnx-2B67 engines, it has a range of approximately 7,630 kilometers (4,120 nautical miles) when fully loaded. Since its first flight in 2010, it has become a mainstay for major cargo operators like UPS, FedEx, and Atlas Air, with over 100 delivered by mid-2022.
While the Antonov An-124 Ruslan is still in service and has a higher maximum takeoff weight (402 metric tons or 886,000 pounds) and payload capacity (150 metric tons or 330,000 pounds), it’s primarily used for specialized heavy-lift missions rather than routine commercial cargo operations. The 747-8F’s widespread use in scheduled and chartered freight services globally makes it the biggest player in the commercial cargo space today. Production of the 747 line ended in 2023, but the -8F remains a workhorse in the skies.
CAUTION! NEVER touch the Tricorder on ANY live terminal or uninsulated live wires.
I can’t even find my certificate or registration number lol. I’ve been getting all the emails so I assume I’m good.