Thank you for your feedback man much appreciated! I will not post it publicly elsewhere it's just for on here but I do wish it to be as nice as possible.Very cool and very thorough, thanks for posting!
If you intend to post it publicly elsewhere, do have it proofread, as there are several spacing issues and multiple extraneous apostrophes.
(Doesn't matter if it's just for here, no big whoop.)
Wow, thank you so much, man! Join the Darkside and become a Vader fanatic promise you will make good friends and possibly become obsessed lolWell, crap, that was so well thought out and informative. I'm not even in the Vader community and now I want to be lol
Thank you my friend I'm gladI love it ,so far, as well
Thanks man much appreciated can't wait to put up the rest for everyoneScruffylooking Very well written up. Look forward to reading more.
Nice write-up.
A few things.
There were originally 5 apple tabs on top. 2 were removed as it was likely too difficult to put the dome on with that many. You see the imprint of all 5 on some Rick Baker tour mold castings.
The Rick Baker mold was made sometime before the footprint ceremony, as Rick Baker was responsible for fixing up the helmet and painting it and molding it to make more tour helmets.
The mold we know as the "UK Mold" could not have been molded before the US mold. It shows cracks and wear that were not present on the helmet when it was molded by Rick Baker and leftover material in the grills and around the eye sockets from that molding is found in the "UK Mold" castings as well as the original as it is now. Also - the apple tab screw orientation are the same on the "UK Mold" castings as it is on the original today, yet we know Rick Baker removed them. He would not have been able to screw them back on exactly the same as they were before. Don Post employees claim to have molded the helmet, which would make sense as the guy doing it had the helmet in his care while Kermit Eller was using it on tour and Eller claims he did not send the helmet back in time for ESB production. So it could not have been molded in UK in time.
Both lineages are from after the repaint, as several key details which are on the original in the pre-repaint look is not present on either lineage helmets.
The nose was painted with the same gunmetal color as the rest of the face mask so was likely painted at the same time as the rest. Not before and not with silver as in ESB/RotJ.
Nice write-up.
A few things.
There were originally 5 apple tabs on top. 2 were removed as it was likely too difficult to put the dome on with that many. You see the imprint of all 5 on some Rick Baker tour mold castings.
The Rick Baker mold was made sometime before the footprint ceremony, as Rick Baker was responsible for fixing up the helmet and painting it and molding it to make more tour helmets.
The mold we know as the "UK Mold" could not have been molded before the US mold. It shows cracks and wear that were not present on the helmet when it was molded by Rick Baker and leftover material in the grills and around the eye sockets from that molding is found in the "UK Mold" castings as well as the original as it is now. Also - the apple tab screw orientation are the same on the "UK Mold" castings as it is on the original today, yet we know Rick Baker removed them. He would not have been able to screw them back on exactly the same as they were before. Don Post employees claim to have molded the helmet, which would make sense as the guy doing it had the helmet in his care while Kermit Eller was using it on tour and Eller claims he did not send the helmet back in time for ESB production. So it could not have been molded in UK in time.
Both lineages are from after the repaint, as several key details which are on the original in the pre-repaint look is not present on either lineage helmets.
The nose was painted with the same gunmetal color as the rest of the face mask so was likely painted at the same time as the rest. Not before and not with silver as in ESB/RotJ.
Thanks for putting your oar back in Dave it is always welcomeOur friend Carsten raises some interesting points which demonstrate that the vast majority of what we "know" about the Vader helmet from ANH through pre-production of ESB is based on a LOT of supposition trying to piece together what little photographic evidence we have. There are two points in particular here that are controversial.
There are indeed drill mark locations on top of the faceplate that indicate spaces for one of the 3M tabs. What we don't know is that there were ever 5 tabs on at the same time. A competing, just as likely supposition, is that they started with two tabs and found that was insufficient to hold the dome in place then moved to three. It could be that 5 was too many (the spacing of the hole locations is certainly suggestive of this) and they had difficulty removing the dome but we don't know. Both conclusions are logical but, again, we're juggling ideas (I don't know if anyone has been able to confirm the 5-tab theory --f it has been confirmed I am unaware and would appreciate being corrected).
Second, there are a LOT of unknowns about the paint job (chiefly what exact paint they used -- we do know about ESB thanks to Ron Punter and we've sort of reverse engineered from there) and the notion that the nose was painted the same gunmetal as the other portions of the faceplate is sort of suggested by what we see on screen -- but also sort of not. A lot of study around tone values has gone into this idea and, like the exact color of the lenses, is still very much in the eye of the beholder.
The timeline that Carsten posits is the one generally accepted ad certainly makes the most sense. From Rick Baker's own observations and photographic evidence of the footprint ceremony at the Chinese theater (which we know the exact date) as well as Mr Eller's statements we can reasonably connect things.
I also want to add that I am not disagreeing with my good friend Carsten -- just pointing out that our knowledge of the Vader helmet is more fluid than any of us really like.
Sorry to put my oar back in.
Cheers,
Dave C
You make a good and rational point with the 5 tabs that are very interesting very much worth for me to put in as an interesting fact of progress on Vader's mask during ANH production, the 5 tabs theory is better as what likely happened when you have logically articulated it like you have thank you CarstenWell, the placement of the tab impressions on top of the "US Mold" helmets suggests that all 5 were added at the same time. If they started with 2, then the marks would not line up when they switched to 3. it would not have been so perfectly spaced and would have been random and overlapping. From that it is reasonable to assume it started out with 5. And knowing how hard it is to snap the dome on even with just 3... just imagine doing that with 5 - made even more difficult by the fact that the top of the facemask is curved.
It seems fair to assume that Rick Baker removed the screen used tabs for molding and likely just screwed the same ones back on after the fact. Though, it is impossible to discern from the evidence we have available whether he added new ones. When evidence is lacking, the simplest answer is the best. He just added back the same ones he took off.
We in the hobby dubbed the mold that created the screen used ESB and RotJ helmets as the "UK Mold". But there is no real evidence suggesting that it was actually made in the UK, as far as I recall. So maybe it should simply be renamed to "Production Mold" instead, while the Rick Baker "US Mold" could be called the "ANH Tour Mold" With all the stories we've compiled from various sources, it does seem both molds were made in the US. First by Baker before the footprint ceremony, then by Don Post during the tour, around the time when ESB production was starting. Though it's been a while since I've looked through all my notes, so I could be mistaken.
For a long time it was believed that the "UK Mold" must have come before the "US Mold". I held that belief and argued for it as well. But evidence that surfaced after the discovery of the screen used facemask in the French collection, makes that impossible. It's a deduction conundrum, but physical evidence that is on the original now that matches the "UK Mold" castings, but are not on the "US Mold" castings makes it clear which came first.