PHArchivist
Master Member
Tread and Phase -- the problem with an unconverted toy is the slop in the wing connections, exacerbated by a "lazy" wing hinge mechanism.
Regardless of the splay of the wing roots, the wings themselves will droop, (such that the upper wing will not be a straight line) due to the looseness of the wing connection clips. This will be corrected by permenantly affixing the wings to the roots, possibly with metal supports, so they won't droop.
Also, the hinge mechanism, by default, relaxes to a rather narrow splay. But you can physically open it further (hyper-extend it, so to speak). I will do this too, and keep it in this position by using shims. You'lll see how I'll do it when I take pics.
The combination of corrections should allow nearly 100% control over the geometry of the overall wing splay/spacing angle.
As Bryan's post points out, we all have varying opinions and reference material regarding teh degree of splay. And I believe its been established that the studio models varied a bit as well. So my model will fit my perception and interpretation.
Regardless of the splay of the wing roots, the wings themselves will droop, (such that the upper wing will not be a straight line) due to the looseness of the wing connection clips. This will be corrected by permenantly affixing the wings to the roots, possibly with metal supports, so they won't droop.
Also, the hinge mechanism, by default, relaxes to a rather narrow splay. But you can physically open it further (hyper-extend it, so to speak). I will do this too, and keep it in this position by using shims. You'lll see how I'll do it when I take pics.
The combination of corrections should allow nearly 100% control over the geometry of the overall wing splay/spacing angle.
As Bryan's post points out, we all have varying opinions and reference material regarding teh degree of splay. And I believe its been established that the studio models varied a bit as well. So my model will fit my perception and interpretation.