Guys serious question
I just learned the other side of mauls double blades lightsaber in s7 was Asajj ventress’s lightsaber.
I did some reading and found she made it after she left dooku, and when she teamed up with the Jedi council to take him down she used that against him
From what I read she sacrificed herself to save her friend and dooku killed her
Her friend (name Escapes me but has the yellow tattoo line under his eyes) he buried her on darthomir
Is there any stories of maul killing her friend and taking the lightsaber?
I’m trying to find any info on mail obtaining her lightsaber and how he did so
Did he just find it on top of her grave?
Quinlan Vos is the character, and it may be in the book Dark Disciple that is about both Ventress and Vos
I don't think there is anything currently that explains it. My own opinion is that at some point Maul must have gone back to Dathomir and found it.Exactly! Yeah I did some googling and can’t find what he did with the lightsaber
Where did you hear this?I just learned the other side of mauls double blades lightsaber in s7 was Asajj ventress’s lightsaber.
The one on the left is Ventress' yellow bladed saber from the Dark Disciple part of her backstory.
I understand that. What I want to know is where is it written or said that it actually is Ventress’ hilt?The one on the left is Ventress' yellow bladed saber from the Dark Disciple part of her backstory.
As I said Dark Disciple. The design is on the front cover and adapted from previous concept art that was designed for The Clone Wars series.I understand that. What I want to know is where is it written or said that it actually is Ventress’ hilt?
Just to clarify, as I understand it is a visual match but you are saying the text in the book actually states Maul is using the Ventress hilt attached to his?As I said Dark Disciple. The design is on the front cover and adapted from previous concept art that was designed for The Clone Wars series.
So then as it stands now, it is simply visually identical to Ventress‘ and not canon?View attachment 1362534
from Reddit. Take the story group proof as you will
You just know that some comic book writer desperate for a story will make a 6 part story about it.yeah seems like it, until they say otherwise either in canon fiction or if Filoni wants to speak up with some “Twitter canon” for what that’s worth.
Seems to me, they don't know - otherwise the answer isn't 'i always assumed'. Therefore, it just got used because someone decided on their own to do it.So then as it stands now, it is simply visually identical to Ventress‘ and not canon?
Seems to me, they don't know - otherwise the answer isn't 'i always assumed'. Therefore, it just got used because someone decided on their own to do it.
Aaahhh, so it’s just reused material.. dang